Child pornography (cp) offenders (also referred to child sexual exploitation materials [csem] offenders) represent a large proportion of caseloads of sexual offenders seen by police, corrections, community supervision officers, and treatment providers (dauvergne & turner, 2010) in the early 2000s.
Child pornography essay examples an offender's perspective on the factors that push producers to distribute child pornography 4,365 words 10 pages a case study on the child protection act of 1984 and the case of keith jacobson's purchase of the ilegally explicit magazines.
Child pornography offenders can also connect on internet forums and networks to share their interests, desires, and experiences abusing children, in addition to selling, sharing, and trading images these online communities have promoted communication and collaboration between child pornography offenders, thereby fostering a larger relationship premised on a shared sexual interest in children.
Our separation of child pornography (cp) possessors from cp producers/distributers does not imply a minimization of the harm caused by those who consume illicit material on the contrary, it is important to remember that cp possessors propel the demand for these materials. When an opportunity to offend appears in conjunction with the presence of risk factors in the potential offender12 address both the sexual and non-sexual motivations to collect and distribute child pornography20 14 see generally eileen m alexy, child pornography offender behavior pornography s, .
Results also indicate cp producers/distributers engaged in a greater number of behaviors indicative of low self-control compared to cp possessors specifically, offenders arrested for cp production/distribution were more likely to have: (1) had problems with drugs/alcohol at the time of the crime and (2) been previously violent.
Because child pornography, as an entire class of speech, is evil and has so little value to the community 14 6 though it appears to be tangential, the policies and justifications for the court’s prohibition of child pornography become vitally important in the solution to the spcp issues.